As the NFL playoff frenzy continues to build approaching conference championship weekend, all eyes and ears seemingly turn to the Patriots and their coach and quarterback. A little Fact and Non-Fiction for consideration:
Fact: Tom Brady and Bill Belichick had an amazing and perhaps unparalleled run, winning 3 Super Bowls (without a loss), and following it up with an undefeated regular season.
Fact: The fact is that the previously unbeatable Tom Brady and Bill Belichick are 0-fer in Superbowls since they were caught cheating and the “When given 2 weeks to prepare, no one will out prepare Bill Belichick!” statement sounds lazy and uninformed today.
Non-Fiction: With media darling Peyton Manning out early in yet another highly anticipated playoff run, the beautiful and talented Tom Brady will now get the lion’s share of attention as the young whippersnappers Flacco, Ryan and Copernicus will be grouped together.
Fact: While the NFL’s leading supermodel impregnator has lost the Prince Valiant haircut, he’s also trying to prove he hasn’t lost his on-field big game mojo. Since his coaches were caught cheating (to give him and his teammates an unfair advantage), this “Guaranteed first ballot HOFer” with “the clutch gene” has reminded us more of Dan Pastorini or even Vince Ferragamo than Joe Montana. Barely over .500.
Non-Fiction: Pastorini, Ferragamo and post-Spygate Brady are all Good looking, physically talented QBs from unusual pre-NFL glory situations who had great regular season success and were average to slightly above average in the playoffs.
Fact: Brady and Belichick have proven to be above average at their craft since the cheating scandal and associated sanctions for said cheating.
Non-Fiction: There’s no shame in just being above average in crunch time, but please… Vince Lombardi should never again be invoked when talking about Belichick and Joe Montana and Terry Bradshaw should never again be invoked when talking about Tom Brady.
I signed up to the “Do Not Call Register” a long time ago, and while I’m sure some telesales organizations do adhere to the rules, far too many do not.
The one that annoys me the most, are a bunch of fu$kwits who call virtually every day to try and sell me discounted electricity. These a$$holes call with an automated message offering to lower the cost of my electricity bill. I continue to ignore them and they continue to call me.
Each time they call it’s a different phone number so blocking the number doesn’t work. I’ve reported them to the DNCR, and yet they keep calling.
One day I would love to meet these pri&ks and explain to them with a variety of household DIY tools the error of their ways.
If there is one perfect way to ensure I will NEVER buy your product, it’s to call my home phone with an automated message.
Discount Electricity Company I wish you would FOAD
Houseowners deal with many issues that are foreign to apartment and condo dwellers. Beyond the seemingly endless (and often expensive) hassles associated with purchasing and moving into a home, one then has to deal with some combination of tasks which include: trash disposal, lawn maintenance, appliance repair and maintenance, outdoor holiday decoration placement and removal, basement flooding, HVAC maintenance, “Mischief Night” soaping and eggings, neighbors’ rogue pets, and on and on. But this is the time of year where you “make some of that back.”
The holiday season for apartment and condo dwellers might as well be renamed the “Tipping Season.” Every person that works in and services the entire building (and parking garage if you have one), expects a hefty tip this time of year. A reward for a job well done (or perhaps some insurance for good service in the year to come). Many of these people are relatively invisible for 11 months of the year but like clockwork they’ll appear in your vicinity several times between Thanksgiving and the end of the year. You’ll get a hearty “Hello!” and smile and even a handshake with eye contact from some of them as they happen to be there vacuuming in front of your door, getting to that old maintenance request, tidying up the lobby or offering to help with a package. Wonderful, friendly busy staff as far as the eye can see. Much like waiters and waitresses, the tip is essentially an expected part of their compensation so you’re a heel if you stiff them.
But how much to tip? When? Who? How do you appropriately “slip them the cash?” Despite literally hundreds of years of doorman buildings and other apartment complexes with staffers on the books, there has been no progress on exactly how to do this “tip drill” well. Does each one get the same or do the people that know your name get more? Is there a “class system” in which doormen get the big dough and maintenance gets 50% less? Can you send a big check or bag of cash to some management flunky and trust them to divvy it up fairly? What’s this year’s “rate?” $100 each? $200? $50 due to Obama and the recession? Does the Super really deserve $500 (after all, he already makes more than everybody else, right?)? Do I slip a $20 to the weekend substitute parking guy?
It’s crazy! Don’t you already pay a “maintenance” fee each year for these services? Even if you want to do the right thing, there’s no way to know what “the right thing” is. Ask most doormen and they’ll shrug and say, “Whatever you think is fair sir.” That’s no help. You may spend thousands of dollars tipping different people and still miss the guy that fixed your toilet during your Superbowl party because you forgot what he looked like (note: you’ll know if that happened the next time you desperately need his services and he’s conveniently unavailable btw).
So to all you house-owners out there, be happy this holiday season knowing that this is your time… a time where you can relax in your home and enjoy the holidays while your apartment-dwelling counterparts are struggling with the all that goes with the “Tipping Season.”
New York wants new businesses to start up here! Newly hired employees, innovative new services and products, new revenue and profits and tax income to the state and more! I’ve heard NY politicians talk about it, “We’re making New York an attractive place to start and grow your company!” and the like.
We’ve heard the stories about successful companies started in a garage or studio apartment with an idea and just a few hundred dollars in some cases. The next thing you know they’ve got a campus, thousands of employees and plans to hire thousands more. Those stories are never about New York companies though, are they? Coincidence? Bad luck? New Yorkers aren’t as smart as people in Washington state or Virginia or elsewhere?
Actually, just the opposite. New York entrepreneurs are smart enough to know that New York state and especially the 5 boroughs of New York City have a unique “Publication” requirement for all new LLCs that will likely cost them thousands of dollars and 6+ weeks of hassles. Open your business elsewhere, no such requirement and no such fee. Hmmm…, NY and pay the fee or anywhere else and not pay the fee. Tough choice for them, eh? How does NY compare to neighboring states for formation of new LLCs per capita? Terrible, of course.
The “Publication” requirement requires new NY businesses to publish an official notice of their existence in multiple printed newspapers for 6 consecutive weeks. Any newspapers? Of course not. They select the newspapers and you have to call the county clerk to get the names of the papers who will get the $. They say the requirement is so the general public is “notified” yet the New York Law Journal with its high rates happens to seemingly always be one of the required newspapers. Big circulation of the general public for that one, eh? Oh, and the information is already available online, for free, to anyone in the general public who wants it on the Secretary of State’s website.
How unique is the fee? 48 states don’t have it, that how unique it is. If you’ve ever been curious about what a “special interest” group is and how their influence can drive lawmakers to do something for just them at the expense of virtually everyone else, here’s your case study at the state level.
$2000.00 may or may not seem like a lot of money to you but to some budding entrepreneurs it is money they could clearly use better elsewhere (elsewhere meaning anywhere other than New York).
I think there is an emerging scandal that needs attention. The “Gate-ing” of non-“Gate”-worthy scandals is a growing epidemic and it’s making me angry. It is an insult to former President Richard Milhous Nixon, G. Gordon Liddy, and the rest of the Watergate gang to try to “-Gate” these minor scandals/dust-ups and put them on the level of the the G-Men’s “work” back in the 70s. It’s the 40th Anniversary of the original “Gate” for crying out loud, so it’s time to act… and I intend to!
So which scandals qualify for “-Gate” status? Let’s evaluate a small sampling (10), of the “best” of the many contenders:
–Travelgate at the White House began in May 1993 and really got the “-Gate” business going when seven employees of the White House Travel Office were fired and replaced with friends of the Clintons. During multiple investigations the discovery of reportedly false statements made by the first lady drove the Clintons to reinstate most of the employees and remove the Clinton associates from the travel office. A 7-year+ investigation involving the White House, FBI, multiple Special Counsels, and the Attorney General = YES, it’s “-Gate”-worthy.
–Troopergate began with the allegations by two Arkansas state troopers that they arranged sexual liaisons for then-governor Bill Clinton and the scandal escalated to include salacious and serious accusations regarding Paula Jones (who was paid $850K by the President), Gennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willey, Juanita Broaddrick, and White House intern Monica Lewinsky (leading to his impeachment by the House of Representatives in 1998. YES
–Spygate was born when with the New England Patriots were found to be secretly taping NY Jets (and likely other teams), signals to gain an unfair advantage. I would have originally voted NO to “-Gate” status for this but upon further review the facts do show an amazing pattern: 3-0 in Super Bowls while spying and cheating, 0-2 in Super Bowls since caught cheating. That’s a YES.
–Bagelgate occurred at a Fortune 500 company’s Annual Meeting in New York when the regular practice of serving breakfast at the stockholder meeting was changed by the incoming CEO, angering long-time stockholders who typically would make a day of it by eating at the meeting, voting their shares (or single share of stock in some cases), and catching a matinee at the theater. The Q&A was dominated by elderly stockholders asking the new CEO why there were no bagels or other breakfast items provided for them at this year’s meeting. Hilarious, but not a “-Gate” – NO
–Nipplegate – Singer Justin Timberlake revealed Janet Jackson’s right breast to 89.8 million viewers in a staged “wardrobe malfunction” during the halftime show of Super Bowl XXXVIII causing an uproar and national debate about decency in modern culture as well as FCC fines for CBS. The most viewed breast and nipple in recorded history = YES
–Editgate – NBC TV edited a 911 recording in a way that made the motivation for the shooting of Trayvon Martin appear racial. Powerful case but not “-Gate-worthy”-NO
–Nannygate – A 1993 political controversy over nomination of Zoë Baird and near-nomination of Kimba Wood for U.S. Attorney General were withdrawn due to their hiring of illegal aliens as nannies or the failure to pay taxes for them. The soon-to-be chief law enforcement officer of the U.S. government and head of the United States Department of Justice breaking the law?… YES
–Paterno/Spanier-gate at Penn State (hey, that rhymes!) – too soon to say but the coverup to hide the actions of a pedophile coach looks extensive and linked to the highest levels of power. TBD
– Camillagate – Scandal which resulted from a tape of a telephone conversation between the married Charles, Prince of Wales and Camilla Parker Bowles in 1993; the tabloids leaked the details of an intimate recording in which Prince Charles told Camilla that he longed to be her tampon. I’m still speechless about the content but not quite a “-Gate” – NO
– Weinergate – U.S. Representative Anthony Weiner’s Twitter account linked to a picture of a bulging penis (in underwear). Weiner said his account had been hacked, but later admitted he sent the tweet; numerous other lewd photographs from the married congressman were later “revealed.” All-time great NY Post tabloid headline (“HIDE THE WEINER”), but not a “-Gate” –so… NO
OK, so our analysis of these 10 media-anointed “-Gate” scandals shows that only half of them met the standard set by “all the President’s men.” And these are only a handful of the dozens and dozens that people dare to bestow with the vaunted “-Gate” suffix. This is Watergate we’re talking here… the biggest coverup in american government history; to besmirch it with Weinergates and other inferiors is tantamount to insulting the constitution itself. It’s not right. It will not stand. Why? I’ll tell you why… Because I’m here, I’m angry and I’m not gonna take it anymore!
UPDATE: Since the publishing of this entry several new unworthy “gates” have emerged (which I won’t detail here), and a new “one-to watch” – namely, “Deflate-gate.” It seems a ballboy at the mighty USC Trojans football program deflated half the footballs (the ones USC QB Matt Barkley would throw), for the recent USC-Oregon football game. You see, a football slightly deflated below official specs is easier to grip, throw and catch than a typical new game ball. Results? Already considered a top QB prospect USC’s Barkley exploded for 303 passing yards and 3 TD passes… in the 1st half! At half-time, officials discovered the cheating and the seeds of “Deflate-gate” were born. USC coach Lane Kiffin and everyone else with the program claim the ballboy was a “lone pin-man” who inserted that pin and masterminded the deflatement. We should all follow this carefully to see if this one becomes worthy of the “Gate” suffix.
President Obamney (I’m not sure who won yet), I feel that if the rest of us have to balance our checkbooks each month (and year), our country should too.
Call me crazy but I believe that the USA can find a way to survive on a meager $2.5 trillion/year (or whatever the expected revenue is next year). Go through every line item the way we workers do with our own budgets and make adult decisions about what you absolutely have to pay for and what is a “nice to have” that will have to wait until you get a raise in revenue or an unexpected bonus. If you and the leaders of the House and Senate can honestly say that every line item in that proposed budget is 100% required this year, then I’ll personally bet you everything I own that you’re full of crap. The size of the debt itself is the next economy and retirement-crushing disaster-in-waiting and you and the House and Senate were elected to address just this kind of tough problem.
Please don’t violate the “No Asshole Rule” and put politics ahead of doing the job right. I don’t care how you do it or who gets the credit and neither should you. If a “line item veto” is how it will get done, then I’ll support the President (and Speaker and Senate Majority Leader if needed) getting that power and I don’t care which party any of them are from.
This isn’t rocket science or difficult to understand and you all know it. Once the budget is balanced for the year, THEN consider options for tackling the existing debt. Increasing taxes and adding those additional short-term $ to the budget kitty will only increase spending, not decrease the debt in my opinion and isn’t that the point, to eliminate the debt itself?
Find a way to spend within your current means and then I’ll support really reviewing all options (including new and higher taxes and fees), to raise revenue for the specific purpose of eliminating the national debt itself.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg is cast as a benevolent Mr. Mom or “He-Nanny” who watches out for New Yorkers, wipes their mouths and fannies, and keeps them safe from evil sugar and 2nd hand smoke. I’m here to tell you that something else may be afoot… something more sinister and malevolent.
What is certain is that he’s trying to make NYers fat; consider these events:
-He cancelled Halloween and trick or treating so now people will eat all the candy themselves and get fat.
-He still has Central Park closed so we can’t exercise there (and make an adult decision as to whether a road or path is “safe”). No exercise = fat.
-The YMCA is again closed today which probably is due to some sort of government meddling or funding or tax issues (the ‘C’ stands for Christian so you never know). No exercise = fat.
-And with no more smoking or large soft drinks allowed, people are drinking more high calorie beer and Red Bull every day! More calories = fat and since smoking also curbs appetite, this = double fat.
It looks to me like NYC’s caring “Nanny Bloomberg” is secretly fattening us all up Hansel & Gretel style for some nefarious purpose. I’m angry and a bit scared but I must say that my giant bag of Reese’s Peanut Butter Pumpkins looks soooooo tasty that I may yet fall into Mrs. Doubtberg’s evil trap! You’ve been warned.
I saw that eBay has unveiled a new logo and re-branding. A bold, dramatic new logo and brand? Ummm, no; same colors and name with a friendly lower case san serif font. Zzzzzzzzz -the bold, pioneering Internet phenomenon has just spent millions to put me to sleep. They waited 17 years for that?
Speaking of pervasive consumer brands, AIG (yes that government-bailed-them-out-’cause-they’re-too-big-to-fail colossus), is re-logoing and rebranding too! A kinder, gentler san serif font will make everyone forget the unpleasantness a few years back (and the $100B they owe us) and buy their insurance now, right? I can just see the boardroom scene now… AIG Exec:”Everyone will see that we’re at least doing SOMETHING; that’s gotta be good! What’s a few dozen mil when you owe billions anyway-let’s do it!” An actual name change would have at least confused half of us enough to forget their past “crimes” but no, it’s still the letters AIG in a box.
Arby’s has joined the party too but don’t panic; they’ve kept the delicious loaves of compressed roast beef and the familiar “hat” and just replaced the old Arby’s font with a warmer, nicer all lower-case san serif font. Friendlier fonts make me hungry, how ’bout you?
Microsoft, JCPenney, CA, Polycom, Cisco and on and on have decided to switch to clean, warm, friendly new logo fonts that just scream, “We’re hip and modern but still warm and approachable!!!” [I’d mention the Tropicana re-branding apocalypse a few years back but that team sleeps with the marketing fishes now and it’s bad luck to speak badly of the dead]. A minor logo change for a few million (or more), bucks plus all that effort to change every sign, collateral piece, business card, etc. must be the super-secret marketing ROI tactic for which we’ve all been waiting. Look, many brands need work to improve how customers and prospects perceive them but I’d estimate that 1/10th of 1% of brands really need a logo change/update to accomplish it.
Am I angry about this new wave of friendly san serif-fonted logo projects (and do I feel that “depraved indifference” marketing should investigated and prosecuted)? Well, I’m certainly shaking my head about the millions and millions being spent on these efforts but I can’t be too mad because I have friends at Lippincott, Siegel + Gale and other branding shops and they need to eat too, right? I am disappointed that so many trained corporate marketing leaders so predictably take the lazy (but expensive), logo refresh route when they know the real solution lies elsewhere.
Full Disclosure Notice: I also actually went to the MoMA’s exhibit, “50 Years of Helvetica” and watched the documentary so I guess I’m at least a closeted san serif fan [Q. Can I love the font itself but hate how it’s being used?].
Anyway, when I see these and other “re-branding to appear to be doing something” exercises they all bring to mind a wise saying I heard back in the 90s: “A dead fish floating down a river shows movement, but not progress.”
A river of expensive dead fishes indeed.
NOTE: If you love new branding and logos (with great commentary), check out the “Brand New” blog. I read it and snagged most of these images from there.
Are amateurs killing your team? Does it make you angry? If you’re a Redskins, Cowboys or Bobcats fan you’d have to answer “Yes.” If you work for a technology firm (or most B2B companies), the answer may surprise you.
“Pros vs. Joes” is how some describe the lopsided battles between expertly trained specialists (Pro-fessionals) and enthusiastic amateurs (Joes). Those battles may begin with the scrappy, confident amateur showing a flash of skill or promise but they don’t end well for the Joes do they? Defeated, red-faced and frustrated is how those match-ups end.
Amazingly, in sports ownership and business today there is a fair amount of “Pros vs. Joes” competition going on but interestingly many of these “Joes” don’t consider themselves amateurs because they are (or were), a successful professional (albeit at something else).
Michael Jordan was the consummate professional basketball player of his era but has proven to be an “Average Joe” (and saying he’s been average is just me being nice), at running basketball franchises (or playing pro baseball for that matter). A Joe who thinks he’s a Pro.
Jerry Jones (Dallas Cowboys) and Daniel Snyder (Washington Redskins) bought their way into big time NFL ownership after being successful “Pros” in Oil and Advertising respectively and each decided they could run their franchises themselves and have been abysmal failures competing with real “Pros” on the field. This has been true despite each of them having virtually unlimited resources. Year after year, these Joes keep going though.
Even old George Steinbrenner (R.I.P.), eventually learned that he needed to hire and empower experts with specialized skills and experience for his organization to win consistently on the field.
The business equivalent of “Pros vs. Joes” are corporate senior executives who “play” at Marketing. By virtue of their exalted status in the company they can insert themselves into Marketing strategy and tactics (and they do). Hey, they took a Marketing class or two in college and they KNOW which TV ads are good or not, so they’re qualified to make Marketing decisions, right?
Why do they do it? Because they can and because it’s fun for them! A reward for their success after years of “paying their dues” I guess. Unfortunately, it leads to disappointing marketing results and a cycle of failure that keeps repeating as long as these Senior Execs “help” with Marketing. Hire a CMO, increase the budget, miss Sales and ROI targets, cut the budget, fire the CMO, rinse and repeat. The befuddling constant in this cycle is letting non-experts (“Joes”) get involved and make decisions. They don’t let amateurs make Engineering or Sales decisions yet they when they do it themselves in Marketing they’re shocked and frustrated when Marketing fails.
Look, I play in a fantasy football league and do pretty well (my beloved Swamp Foxes with our spicy Laura Croft logo won another title last year), and I’d love a shot at actually doing it for real. Heck, I even played some ball and could throw it 70 yards back in the day so I’m as qualified as anyone, right?
People who can and do use money and/or power to compete head-to-head with real Pros deserve to get clobbered and fail; those who repeat the cycle should be treated for insanity. Stick to what know Joe-
Consider Gore, Al. For a guy who was never president, he’s incredibly well known for a great many things. Which one will rise to the top and be his final 1-line epitaph? Some possibilities include:
– 1/2 of the fiery young Clinton-Gore presidential team for 8 years who drove the “Reinventing Government” initiative to cut waste and red tape in Washington, DC
– Inventing the Internet (and making us capitalize “Internet”)
– “Inventing” the Global Warming issue (or the GW myth if you’re skeptical), and winning the Nobel Prize for it
– Losing his home state of Tenessee (with 11 Electoral votes) in a presidential election he lost by 5 Electoral votes
– The icky, creepy on-stage, on-air erotic kisser of Tipper “Parental Advisory record labels” Gore
– Hanging chads and the most controversial election result in generations
– Co-founder of “Current TV” network (with Joel Hyatt)
…Or will Mr. Gore just be best remembered for being a hilarious “head-in-a-jar” (a preachy, boring one at that) on the animated TV show Futurama?
So, will Albert Arnold Gore, Jr. best be remembered for something “positive” or something “negative?”
There’s a saying from an Australian philanthropist, lifesaver and pubbuilder known as Sheepshagger John which may help you predict the answer, “You know, a man can do a thousand great things, but if you “shag” one lousy sheep…”– (5) (7)